Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: L.A. Women Date: May 27, 2008 5:44pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the "forgotten man"

My take on him is that his style was more artsy and a good fit for what they were doing in early 69, a little less so by 70 with the introduction of the workingman's blues material. By 71 I don't see how he would have fit in at all, he just doesn't/wouldn't mesh well with alot of the material they began to play.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: stratocaster Date: May 27, 2008 7:25pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the "forgotten man"

that's it basically, he did very well on the psychadelic set pieces of 1969, once they veered off into the direction of acoustic guitars and gunpowder, he got left behind in the cloud of smoke...